Follow LOHD -
http://twitter.com/LOHDgamecocks
Gamecock Twibe -
Visit - http://twibes.com/Gamecocks - to join.
http://twitter.com/LOHDgamecocks
Gamecock Twibe -
Visit - http://twibes.com/Gamecocks - to join.
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Saturday Gamecock Clips
1. USC baseball coach Ray Tanner continues to build his program for the future Friday with a commitment for 2011 from multi-position player Austin Gambrell (6-2 165) of Belton-Honea Path.2. The 7th round pick, Stoney Woodson, signs up for his payday with the Giants...a mere $1.8 mil...not bad for a part-time starter the past three seasons. To make room for Woodson, the Giants cut CB Rashad Barksdale.
3. Staley flexing muscle with big offseason
Other stuffs
---Dennis Dodd of CBSSports.com writes about the issue of Florida’s 24 arrests under Urban Meyer.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Go Easy Chris Low on the Gamecocks Chances
ESPN's Chris Low writes today when asked about the gamecocks chances of winning the SEC EAST:"I do think the Gamecocks will be improved on the offensive line. Steve Spurrier has been impressed by what he's seen out of new offensive line coach Eric Wolford, who will also head up South Carolina's running game. This much we know: The offensive line can't get much worse. The Gamecocks didn't run the ball very well last season, nor did they protect the passer. The defensive line, especially with the return of tackle Ladi Ajiboye from suspension, will again be strong. My biggest concern with the Gamecocks is all the young players they will be playing. They have no depth in the secondary and nobody behind Garcia should he get hurt. I like the Gamecocks' chances to make it back to a bowl game, but I honestly don't give them any shot in the Eastern Division race. Their schedule is one of the toughest in the league."
Ouch, easy, give it to us with some sugar-coating next time b/c we know the reality we face but give us some hope b/c we are gamecocks fans (insert 'wait till next year phrase')....thoughts?
Way to go Ron Aiken
A story from the Free Times by Ron Aiken
Barker: Unethical Manipulator or Undiagnosed Imbecile?
BY RON AIKEN
Allow me, if you will, to delve slightly off-topic to address something in the world of higher education that, I promise, will eventually come to a discussion about sports.
Like many people, I was absolutely shocked to read that Clemson University president James Barker believes in his heart of hearts that Clemson is the best university in the country, having voted it so in the peer-review portion of the U.S. News & World Report’s annual rankings in 2008, giving the land-grant school the only “strong” rating out of some 260 institutions of higher education.
In fact, not only did Barker vote Clemson as the nation’s best university, what’s more, not only in his mind was Clemson the best, he also scored the majority of the country’s universities as only “marginal.” (One guess where he scored USC.)
By any rubric, there is simply no way any sane person can arrive at the conclusion that Clemson is the best school in the country. Clemson is not even the best school in its own athletic conference by a million miles; a sound argument can be made that it’s not the best school in its own state; and, given the stellar academic reputation of Furman and its off-campus amenities, one can debate whether Clemson is even the best school in the greater Greenville area.
When Clemson University’s Catherine Watt first suggested that Barker had voted thusly as a rule and actually used the word “unethical” in relation to such practices, her claims were immediately derided by the Clemson spin machine as “outrageous” and having crossed the line. In the real world, the one that exists outside Tillman Hall, the only thing “outrageous” here is Barker’s conduct in completing what everyone understands is supposed to be an honest assessment of other school’s reputations, an assessment, it must be noted, that carries the greatest weight ? a hefty 25 percent ? of the overall ranking criteria.
Here’s the issue in a nutshell: Either Barker honestly believes Clemson is a better school than Harvard, in which case he is stupid and should be fired immediately, or he was, as Watt alleged, deliberately disingenuous in his rankings for the sole ? and reprehensible ? purpose of artificially inflating his school’s rankings.
Think of Barker’s rankings this way: You’re a “C” student in a college class, and you learn that a full quarter of your grade will come from the professor asking your honest evaluation of your own and other student’s performance during the course. If you were to give yourself the highest marks over those you know to be smarter than you and who worked harder than you, that would be cheating.
And yet this was done not by a fictitious Clemson student but by Clemson’s actual president. And it was not just one person or one class’ grades that were affected ?an entire national survey used by graduating seniors across the country was deliberately skewed by Barker’s malicious, self-serving degradation of the nation’s best universities. In other words, he cheated to make his agricultural school, and himself by association, look better than it is.
Folks, if Barker and Clemson don’t understand that success obtained through cheating should not be celebrated ? and this to me is by far the most damning condemnation of Barker and Clemson imaginable ? then something in their mindset is seriously warped.
Of his valuation of Clemson in his rankings, Barker wrote this in a letter intended to allay critics, assuage the faithful and stand as his final response on the issue: “I will not apologize for believing that Clemson is the best undergraduate school in America.”
I agree that no one should apologize for their beliefs ? on that point Barker and I are BFFs. However, if you believe that the Earth is the biggest planet in the solar system or that any Harvard graduate would trade their degree for one from Clemson, I have the right to believe you are a dangerous moron who has no business in a position of ethical or educational leadership.
Oh yeah, I was supposed to bring this back around to sports, so here goes. The recent events at Clemson led me to think back to the last time Clemson made it its express goal to be No. 1 in the nation at something at all costs ? in this case, football ? and you’ll recall that to achieve that goal, which it did, Clemson blatantly cheated and manipulated the system to do so, prompting the NCAA to charge the school in 1982 (just one year after winning the now-tainted 1981 title) with no less than 25 specific and severe violations that demonstrated a school out of control in its quest for results.
What this entire sickening episode tells me is that bending the rules and, in some cases, blatantly cheating to achieve rankings is nothing new at Clemson and, it may be argued by the cynical and/or astute, is actually common practice. If that, according to Barker, is the standard of the nation’s best university, then we as a country are screwed indeed.
BY RON AIKEN
Allow me, if you will, to delve slightly off-topic to address something in the world of higher education that, I promise, will eventually come to a discussion about sports.
Like many people, I was absolutely shocked to read that Clemson University president James Barker believes in his heart of hearts that Clemson is the best university in the country, having voted it so in the peer-review portion of the U.S. News & World Report’s annual rankings in 2008, giving the land-grant school the only “strong” rating out of some 260 institutions of higher education.
In fact, not only did Barker vote Clemson as the nation’s best university, what’s more, not only in his mind was Clemson the best, he also scored the majority of the country’s universities as only “marginal.” (One guess where he scored USC.)
By any rubric, there is simply no way any sane person can arrive at the conclusion that Clemson is the best school in the country. Clemson is not even the best school in its own athletic conference by a million miles; a sound argument can be made that it’s not the best school in its own state; and, given the stellar academic reputation of Furman and its off-campus amenities, one can debate whether Clemson is even the best school in the greater Greenville area.
When Clemson University’s Catherine Watt first suggested that Barker had voted thusly as a rule and actually used the word “unethical” in relation to such practices, her claims were immediately derided by the Clemson spin machine as “outrageous” and having crossed the line. In the real world, the one that exists outside Tillman Hall, the only thing “outrageous” here is Barker’s conduct in completing what everyone understands is supposed to be an honest assessment of other school’s reputations, an assessment, it must be noted, that carries the greatest weight ? a hefty 25 percent ? of the overall ranking criteria.
Here’s the issue in a nutshell: Either Barker honestly believes Clemson is a better school than Harvard, in which case he is stupid and should be fired immediately, or he was, as Watt alleged, deliberately disingenuous in his rankings for the sole ? and reprehensible ? purpose of artificially inflating his school’s rankings.
Think of Barker’s rankings this way: You’re a “C” student in a college class, and you learn that a full quarter of your grade will come from the professor asking your honest evaluation of your own and other student’s performance during the course. If you were to give yourself the highest marks over those you know to be smarter than you and who worked harder than you, that would be cheating.
And yet this was done not by a fictitious Clemson student but by Clemson’s actual president. And it was not just one person or one class’ grades that were affected ?an entire national survey used by graduating seniors across the country was deliberately skewed by Barker’s malicious, self-serving degradation of the nation’s best universities. In other words, he cheated to make his agricultural school, and himself by association, look better than it is.
Folks, if Barker and Clemson don’t understand that success obtained through cheating should not be celebrated ? and this to me is by far the most damning condemnation of Barker and Clemson imaginable ? then something in their mindset is seriously warped.
Of his valuation of Clemson in his rankings, Barker wrote this in a letter intended to allay critics, assuage the faithful and stand as his final response on the issue: “I will not apologize for believing that Clemson is the best undergraduate school in America.”
I agree that no one should apologize for their beliefs ? on that point Barker and I are BFFs. However, if you believe that the Earth is the biggest planet in the solar system or that any Harvard graduate would trade their degree for one from Clemson, I have the right to believe you are a dangerous moron who has no business in a position of ethical or educational leadership.
Oh yeah, I was supposed to bring this back around to sports, so here goes. The recent events at Clemson led me to think back to the last time Clemson made it its express goal to be No. 1 in the nation at something at all costs ? in this case, football ? and you’ll recall that to achieve that goal, which it did, Clemson blatantly cheated and manipulated the system to do so, prompting the NCAA to charge the school in 1982 (just one year after winning the now-tainted 1981 title) with no less than 25 specific and severe violations that demonstrated a school out of control in its quest for results.
What this entire sickening episode tells me is that bending the rules and, in some cases, blatantly cheating to achieve rankings is nothing new at Clemson and, it may be argued by the cynical and/or astute, is actually common practice. If that, according to Barker, is the standard of the nation’s best university, then we as a country are screwed indeed.
76 days till USC kicks-off 09 season
Having it close to 100 degrees today in South Carolina reminded us at LOHD that the Gamecock football season is just around the corner....so on this hot day remember that Beer Hydrates Better Than Water .
Thursday, June 18, 2009
USC 2nd toughest schedule?
Matt Hayes from the The Sporting News writes about the upcoming SEC football schedule check out this link to read his full explanations, but as usual here is the cliff notes....
The SEC’s non-conference schedules from toughest to weakest:
1. Georgia
2. South Carolina
3. LSU
4. Alabama
5. Tennessee
6. Vanderbilt
7. Mississippi State
8. Auburn
9. Florida
10. Kentucky
11. Arkansas
12. Ole Miss
So this guy has us as having the 2nd toughest schedule in the league and Phil Steele had USC as having the toughest schedule in the nation....I guess bottom line is the schedule is not a cake walk and the Gamecock football team will have to "man-ip" in 09!
The SEC’s non-conference schedules from toughest to weakest:
1. Georgia
2. South Carolina
3. LSU
4. Alabama
5. Tennessee
6. Vanderbilt
7. Mississippi State
8. Auburn
9. Florida
10. Kentucky
11. Arkansas
12. Ole Miss
So this guy has us as having the 2nd toughest schedule in the league and Phil Steele had USC as having the toughest schedule in the nation....I guess bottom line is the schedule is not a cake walk and the Gamecock football team will have to "man-ip" in 09!
USC signees not qualified / Jeffery crossing fingers
Three South Carolina football signees are headed to either prep school or junior college, while highly touted (4 star) Calhoun County receiver Alshon Jeffery is awaiting test results to see if he qualifies academically.
The 3 players are -
WR Charles Holmes
DE Duane Chisolm
DB Chris Payne
Not surprised really that we lose a couple in the recruiting process...we do this every year. However the Jeffery situation does scare me as he is a playmaker that had a shot at PT this fall.
MORE HERE and HERE
The 3 players are -
WR Charles Holmes
DE Duane Chisolm
DB Chris Payne
Not surprised really that we lose a couple in the recruiting process...we do this every year. However the Jeffery situation does scare me as he is a playmaker that had a shot at PT this fall.
MORE HERE and HERE
Gamecocks have more success on recruiting trail - JT Surratt Commits
According to Scout.com....South Carolina picked up its eighth commitment of the 2010 recruiting class on today when Parkland (Winston Salem, NC) DT Jalen "J.T." Surratt gave his pledge to USC coaches Jay Graham and Brad Lawing.
Go Cocks! Keep them coming!
Go Cocks! Keep them coming!
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Shot of Gamecock Mid-Week News
Here is a evening shot of some gamecock links for your reading pleasure and to catch you up -
- Ryan Succop inks deal with KC
- Luke Winn of Sports Illustrated takes a stab at who’s had the best (and worst) offseasons in the college basketball world.
- ESPN.com’s Andy Katz is the latest national writer to bestow “winner” or “loser” status on college basketball programs based on the NBA departures or returns--“… South Carolina will certainly be in the mix in the suddenly rugged SEC East.”
- Morris: Context adds to USC's .500 feat
- Gamecocks land instate QB recruit
- Draft dodgers set up SEC for big year
- Upstate shortstop excited about USC commitment
- Wharton's football camp a hit
- Spurrier: 'I think we've got a team on the verge, I really do.'
- Off Season stories according to Rivals.com
- Rivals.com presents its 2009 countdown, here is 120 to 86
- AJ Cann commits to Gamecocks
- Gamecock CB found innocent
- This prediction by Seth Emerson can not be right...can it?
- Dalles signs pro contract
- Andy Katz says Gamecocks Preseason Top 25
- Update on former Gamecock baseball players
- USC gets another QB; Shaw the real deal?
- D Mack signs with NY Yankees
- 2009 CFN South Carolina Preview
- 2009 CFN South Carolina Preview
- 2009 South Carolina Offense
- 2009 South Carolina Defense
- 2009 South Carolina Depth Chart
- Ten Best USC Players
Also remember this when tailgating in the 90+ heat for Carolina games....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
